Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Individualistic Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Heal The World

It is indeed noteworthy that Eid celebrations throughout India were muted, with Muslims wearing black armbands to protest against terrorism. The Imams of Jama Masjid and Fatehpuri also condemned terrorist “jihad,” calling it a crime against all people.

We therefore have a situation tailor-made for liberal politics and the moral idea that we all seek to survive through free markets.

This is an idea that can unite Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Parsees, Jains and even Buddhists. But let us begin with Hindus, the majority, and Indian Muslims, the world’s biggest minority. These communities must be united. This must be the goal of liberal politics.

We have had enough of “divide and rule,” ever since the partition of Bengal in 1905 by that idiot Curzon. It is an important historical fact that the Indian Muslim League was set up in 1906 – in Dacca. Since then, the country has been divided into three parts – but the Hindu-Muslim problem remains. Only a principled liberalism can heal the body politic and unite all faiths.

Both Hinduism and Islam are religions based on free markets. The Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, was a trader, as was his wife Khadija. The first Muslims were all traders. There is a story told that when these first Muslims arrived at Medina, the Prophet asked the citizens of Medina and his followers to “fraternize in Allah.” The Medinians rushed to share their belongings with the new arrivals – but they refused, saying in one voice, “Show us the way to the market, and we will earn our keep by working.” The Prophet is on record saying, “He who makes money pleases Allah.”

Similarly, Hinduism discovered the idea that honest profits that accrue to an individual are also beneficial to the whole of society: Shubh Laabh. We have an entire caste group of traders. Traders formed a separate “varna” in Hindu society of old. Indeed, Hindu traders are among the smartest in the world. In London they say: “A Bania can buy from a Jew and sell to a Scot and still emerge with a profit.” All the corner shops in London are owned by Hindus and Muslims from this sub-continent, so much so that there is an Asian rock band in England called Cornershop.

Of course, Jains, Sikhs and Parsees are all people whose lives are based on the morality of free markets. Parsee are all urban traders, and their surnames – like Daruwallah and Bandookwallah – are based on the urban “division of labour.” There is a market inside the compound of the Golden Temple in Amritsar. Almost all Sikhs earn their living through markets – Manmohan and Montek being exceptions to that general rule. Non-theistic Jains are all invariably businessmen of high quality. And if we look at Buddhists – the Tibetans have become the biggest traders in woolen sweaters throughout India. Their momos and thukpas are now household words in every city. And, with freedom, undoubtedly their great rice beer, chhung, would become famous as well.

Liberal politics in India should therefore work towards uniting all the people, of all the faiths, in the idea of free trade and free markets.

Away with socialism!

Away with divide-and-rule!

6 comments:

  1. got lucky... it's from the office network, some pages keep getting blocked at times... it's a company policy to block pages like these always....

    but i get by with a little help from my friends!

    I liked the underlying concept of this article.
    But is it impossible to ignore the existence of organized religion?
    Why can we NOT belong in a religion and only in the free-market?

    I mean, the last thing we need for unity is organized religion. It is much better to have surnames like Daruwallah or Bandookwallah or Engineer than Ganguli, or Patodia or Richards which immediately project your ethnic/religious background which never defines the person you are.

    At least identity as a professional in a particular field is much more rational and acceptable.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Our morality is not the product of any single human mind, but has "evolved" along with the growth of civilization, and the growth of the human mind itself.

    So we must not attempt to change what we did not create.

    However, there is nothing in The Law against atheism. If you desire, you can change your name, and reject the gods of your forefathers.

    In either case, the blog post is for a new kind of healing politics, and in politics we must recognize the the people whose support we seek have faith in religion, organized or not. Religion exists. In politics we cannot ignore that.

    Of course, religion is a private matter. And we do not want to promote any religious group at the expense of the rest. Hope this answers your queries.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Basically, religion is for people who have no faith in themselves, who need a « higher order » to run to, like a whimpering child running to its father at every sign of trouble. Can a free market flourish, or even exist, in a society where such people dominate? What matters most in a free society is a strong sense of “I”, not the existence of God or any would-be savior or messiah. To thine own self be true…

    And take a look at this (http://bonjourplanetearth.blogspot.com/2008/12/mob-violence-in-india-i-dont-know-whos.html) and tell me if a free market or free trade or free anything can exist with lunatics like these…

    ReplyDelete
  4. true Toni,
    we do not live in isolation and the perfect order is only an utopia, however, like it or not, profit is the true motive for all activities, not merely in monetary sense.

    its only in narrow terms that, we restrict ourselves to finances when thinking of profit or the markets.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nice thoughts. Hopped over here from a link on twitter.

    Religion or not, conflicts are avoided when there are interdependencies. Trade has usually been the reason why communities coexisted in a reasonably peaceful manner until someone comes along and fans the flames of resentment and just when the fire gets going, throw some religion-laden-accelerator into the fire. Trade can only take us that far but it has the most potential to keep us safe until the next crazy manipulator arrives.

    And NICE FLAG :-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. i think morality, conscience and faith in one particular religion is a genetic development of certain parts of the human brain.

    The physical existence of conscience or morality in an organic form denies its divinity.

    Only logic and the law of individual freedom should prevail in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete