Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Individualistic Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Against Our Desi Taliban

Both the news and the opinion pages are full of apprehension that politically connected goon squads imposing their moral and cultural values on others implies that Free India is facing “talibanization.” See this editorial.

The adjective is apt. The Taliban believe that theirs is the perfect culture, the perfect Islam, that they are its guardians, and that coercion is a fine means of achieving the “Perfect State.” The people are just sheep. In the Perfect State, these people will obey orders and pay taxes. Theirs is not an ideology of either freedom or justice; theirs is an ideology of domination. And in this the Taliban are not very different from any of our Hindoo fundamentalists.

So where do we go? To the Congress? I dare say not. Here is the news of a Congress chief minister opposing the “pub culture” as it is not sanctioned by “tradition.” Perhaps Ashok Gehlot believes that the culture of the Delhi Congress is best: there are no pubs, people are advised to drink at home; and The State is the monopoly retailer of booze. Win-Win. Taliban with the profit motive.

Fortunately, our ancestors have left behind telling records of the liberties they enjoyed. Chanakya’s Arthashastra contains a chapter on the regulation of drinking taverns. An interesting rule stipulates that if a traveler passes out in a tavern, the tavern owner is liable for the safety of his person and properties.

The Arthashastra lists out alcoholic drinks that were locally made. It also contains a longer list of alcoholic drinks that were imported. No swadeshi at all. This was India circa 350 BC. There must have been thousands of drinking taverns in Takshashila, Pataliputra and the other great cities of the time. And there was music, dance and entertainment – for the Arthashastra also contains a chapter on the regulation of these arts, and the women who practice them. Ancient Indian culture was closer to the Goa Model of Liberty than the Taliban.

In this war between party animals and political party animals let it be widely known that we who detest political parties and love all other kinds have history and tradition on our side. Including the tradition of liberal public administration. What do our enemies have on their side? God?

We Hindus are lucky that we have many gods, many holy books, and many godmen. We have no pope. Our priests are competitive service providers. They cannot issue fatwas. Our religion teaches us to look for moksha our own way, through our own guru. And we have many false gurus. Many false sadhus. Many false godmen. So the path before us is strictly individualistic. We are not a communitarian faith. The Hindoos who want to talibanize us want to turn us into a communitarian faith – like the Sikhs, Parsees, Christians and Muslims. They want to do this not because they value religion: rather, they want to take over our The State, which is itself based on collectivism.

We Must Not Be Fooled Again.

So party on, dudes, as Free Individuals.

And fuck all the collectivists.

8 comments:

  1. Way to Go Sauvik!

    Just one clarification:

    If individual morality condones honest profit-making, and freedom in The Market allows thug priests to profit, how do we check on that?

    My point is, you can make the general thug liable to pay torts, but what about the housewife who plays messiah on her children according to 'knowledge' of future under which she feels blissfuly blessed?

    ReplyDelete
  2. and of course the thug who gave her that 'knowledge'

    ReplyDelete
  3. Faheem,

    ... whatever!

    Not peeing in bed is a hygenic habit. It is one of the basic human values like honesty and profiting. Laws of the Land does not penalize anybody for peeing in bed. Your social responsiblity is to see that you don't pee in your neighbour's backyard and that you do not disturb your children and their lovers getting close.

    And yes, remember to thank me for reminding you your social responsiblities. I deserve it.

    Say 'Progress'
    No to 'tradition'!

    don't be the dependent old fool who tries to mix old and new and call it gold because you can't invent it. Dont be scared.

    ReplyDelete
  4. another set of wonderful words....good stuff sauvik....but then low self esteem does lead to collectivism....and indians though a satisfied lot in misery....as they urbanise..are getting collectivist.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dear Sauvik da
    It is a daily ritual these days to visit the antidote. I like the ancient politics reference in this post the most. Don't you think that a basic understanding of Arthashastra of Chanakya is absent in our thought? Can't we think beyond the monopoly of information, money, morality, force and law which is what state is today? You have been dealing these issues regulrly.Will you mention what should be the right intent of politics?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sunil: The best politics is that which enlarges the scope of Liberty. The worst politics is that which enlarges the scope of The State. This is the difference between my politics and, say, Nehru's. Will try and do a separate post on this soon.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The history of alcohol in India goes back even longer than Arthashastra. A complete chapter in the Rig Veda is dedicated to 'Soma', the intoxicating drink which was extremely popular with the people.

    ReplyDelete