Every journalist must be in the “profession.”
He said this at his convocation address to graduates of a prestigious school of journalism in Bangalore.
He said:
“Show me a citizen lawyer or a citizen doctor and I’ll show you citizen journalists,” he said, adding that journalism was a profession like any of the other two.
The word “profession” must be differentiated from the word “vocation.” Lawyers and doctors are “self-regulating professions” in the precise sense that they are allowed to practise under a “system” which they alone have set – like MBBS or LlB.
Yet, I do believe there are Citizen Doctors. There is Dr. Anil Patel, for example, medicine man, political activist, and deep scholar of Austrian economics and its epistemological tradition, who heads the NGO Arch-Vahini based out of Gujarat, and is an old friend. Anilbhai is “out of the system”: he cannot be called a “professional.” He is pursuing his “vocation.”
Of course, there are many Citizen Lawyers too, like the lawyer I came across who worked pro bono for a local unit of the People’s Union For Civil Liberties in a small town I was passing through. There are many such lawyers who practise while conducting their own brand of civic activism. Indeed, this is why many politicians are lawyers.
But let us contrast Journalism with medicine and the law. There is no “degree” we require from a Professional Journalists’ Academy or, even worse, from The State, in order to enter the field of journalism, unlike the MBBS or LlB.
Thus, journalism is NOT a “profession” at all; it is a “vocation,” which in turn implies that it leaves a lot of open areas open for individualism, for doing your own thing, for fighting your own causes, for whatever. As a journalist, you can be “The Last DJ” – and, indeed, you must (hear the song:=)). It is the anthem of this blog.
Shekhar Gupta hogs the media with a huge presence in both print as well as television. He also received the Padma Shri award from our The State – and accepted it. He has serious views on the legitimacy of “political organizations” in India. He seems to think that journalism is also “organized,” or should be. In either case, he dismisses The Last DJ. He scoffs at the idea of a Citizen Journalist.
The new politics I am talking about is all about such Citizen Journalists – who spread the virus of Liberty Under Law, acting only with their own knowledge, convictions and limitations, answerable to no one but the public, who surely know how to separate the grain from the chaff. They could be in newspapers, magazines, tv, radio, blogs, twitter, whatever. May their vocation never become a profession. May Knowledge Always Be Free.
Of course, this is why doctors and lawyers are treated as a special category in modern political science – for doctors have an interest in lowering the supply of doctors, or permit the lowering of professional standards to allow paramedics to practise among the poor, while lawyers have an interest in increased litigation. And doctors teach doctors, lawyers teach lawyers. How can Journalism ever be compared to these professions?
Anyway, the more we peek into the mind of the “professional journalist,” the scarier it gets.
Scary, dudes.
But I leave you with a sense of optimism: the opening lines of "The Last DJ" by Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers. It goes:
You can't turn him into a company man,
You can't turn him into a whore,
And the boys upstairs just don't understand anymore.
And the top brass don't like him talking so much,
And he won't play what they say to play,
And he don't wanna change, what don't need to change.
There goes the Last DJ,
Who says what he wants to say,
Who plays what he wants to play,
hey hey hey
There goes your freedom of choice,
There goes the last human voice,
There goes the Last DJ.
Most Indian Express old timers are not exactly people who sail in the same direction as where the prevailing opinion of the country is heading. Even Aditya Sinha writes in a strong language that most columnists of other big papers would not dare to. Gupta belongs to the same league as Sinha, and he uses TV for maximum effect too. Some drop-outs like Sauvik will always be there to protest. HIs world-view is based on loosely held terms invented by business-minded persons, such as citizen journalism, but which does not do any good.
ReplyDeleteGupta's use of the word 'profession' in the speech relates to skills a journalist must posses to bring out stories. Of course anybody can write or telecast stories under citizen journalism, but not all can be objective or free from errors. Will a citizen journalist know how to check facts? Some will, but a million won't. Can they write well? Quote relevant persons?
Shoot ethical pictures?
Citizen journalism is a backup to give some meaning to all other forms of activism.
By twisting that simple affirmation of journalism as a profession by a visiting old timer to young students, who have studied the subject for a full one year under difficult conditions, Sauvik has misinterpreted the point. His personal dislike of Gupta has clouded his judgement.
Let a citizen journalist step into any TV channel, even a small rate, cheap regional office and produce 5 minute worth of viewable news... Or let him make a page in this New World office.
That's where professionalism comes. Comparing medicine and law against journalism is, like many of us say, 'intellectual masturbation.'
Daneka:
ReplyDeleteI strongly object to this sentence of yours:
"His personal dislike of Gupta has clouded his judgement."
I have never met the man.
And I have been a regular contributor to the Indian Express as well as a Sunday columnist for The New Indian Express of Aditya Sinha, whom you mention, and who too I have never met. Considering what they pay, these contributions of mine should be considered "citizen journalism."
I further object to your false expression to describe me: "drop-outs like Sauvik... ".
I write a monthly column for Mint.
And I write a daily post on my blog.
I research new issues every day.
I write books too.
As an author and journalist I am active and productive, unlike many of the lazy "professionals" who hang around all day in newspaper offices producing little or no copy.
I have used polite language in my post so I take strong objection to these words of yours:
"Comparing medicine and law against journalism is, like many of us say, 'intellectual masturbation.'"
It is precisely Shekhar Gupta who made the comparison. It is he who is quoted as follows:
“Show me a citizen lawyer or a citizen doctor and I’ll show you citizen journalists,” he said, adding that journalism was a profession like any of the other two.
All I did was point out that journalism is NOT a profession like the other two, and that he is wrong. Further, that the citizen journalist exists, and should be encouraged.
I thought journalists would enjoy understanding the deep differences between "professions" like medicine and law and the world of the media. Theirs is indeed a "vocation" in which all kinds of "knowledge" can flourish - from wine journalism to automotive journalism, from sports to economic opinion.
These will need "technical support" from various "professionals" today, given the high-tech environment we work in.
That does not make journalism a "profession." It always was, and will always remain, a "vocation."
"anybody can write or telecast stories under citizen journalism, but not all can be objective or free from errors. Will a citizen journalist know how to check facts? Some will, but a million won't. Can they write well? Quote relevant persons?
ReplyDeleteShoot ethical pictures?"No one does that. Read or see Shekhar Gupta first,before adding qualities to him.
Gupta's use of the word 'profession' in the speech relates to skills a journalist must posses to bring out stories. Of course anybody can write or telecast stories under citizen journalism, but not all can be objective or free from errors. Will a citizen journalist know how to check facts? Some will, but a million won't. Can they write well? Quote relevant persons?
Shoot ethical pictures?
Seriously, you are making me laugh.
The mainstream media around the world is as pathetic as it comes.
And there is a huge difference betweeen stories and news. Apparently You have the same complaints from CJs that I have from "Professional Journalists"
(highlighted in bold,and may I also add non biased)
The Internet is doing to the world what the press did in the past. The revolution has come and is here to stay. Newspapers are dead.
ReplyDeleteCJ's will gain or lose credibility based on how much effort they put into their "news". Readers are free to read or NOT read them!
Meme's will spread more virulently.
The world is going to evolve in very interesting ways! Buckle your seatbelts.
~Mojito (a devout Pastafarian)
If I may be allowed to be cynical, Gupta is just trying to save his job, and by his tirade against the "anarchy" of party less wonders, the jobs of his brethren in the establishment. God forbid that any riff-raff should challenge the entrenched interests of self-appointed patriarch of the society! Citizen activism is great, but shall we just limit it to pushing a button every 5 years? Otherwise we might just have "anarchy", and that can't be good for our friends in high places!
ReplyDeleteAs Anonymous says, the internet is here. Newspapers are dead. It's giving the guardians of the intellectual debate the death-rattle. I say bring it on.
@daneka
"HIs world-view is based on loosely held terms invented by business-minded persons"
What have you got against "business-minded" people? A business man provides services to the society, and that's supposed to be bad? Your world-view, sir, is based on loosely held terms invented by GOVT-minded persons.