Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Individualistic Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Monday, May 11, 2009

On Sardars, Sardars, And More Sardars

Callous.

That is the right word to describe Chacha Manmohan S Gandhi’s statement that the “1984 riots cannot be kept alive forever.”

Does that mean we all forget the Holocaust? Or Hiroshima? Or any other instance of deliberate mass murder?

And do note that the word “riot” is inappropriate. What happens in India are “pogroms.” What happened in 1984 in Delhi was a pogrom against Sikhs. The pogrom was organized by Congressmen. There has been no justice yet. And we know that the Congress is very fond of Jagdish Tytler and Sajjan Kumar.

Yet, Chacha is the PM-candidate of the Congress.

He has spoken as a loyal Congressman, not as a Sardar.

So let us turn to another Sardar, who has spoken like a true “Sardar”: MS Gill.

He is opposing an SMS gambling game. (Read about the game here.)

Amit Verma has already lambasted him in an open letter.

But allow me to lend some muscle to Amit’s arguments.

MS Gill is a former chief election commissioner who has shown us his political affiliation by becoming a minister in the Congress-led government. Yet, elections are the biggest legal gamble in India! Candidates gamble in the electoral sweepstakes.

MS Gill was running the casino – as an interested party.

So much for Sardar-speak.

We should get Montek the Sardar Planner in, shouldn’t we? And his predictions of the growth rate.

Anyway, with so many Sardars running the government, it was bound to mess up real bad. Here is news that the courts in Switzerland have ruled that documents submitted to them in a money-laundering case by the Enforcement Directorate are forged. Pune-based racehorse breeder Hassan Ali is innocent.

I am always happy when a man’s wealth is saved from State usurpation.

6 comments:

  1. your bias against the sikhs reflects a deap seated malice. I would like to know how is his in sync with your purported libertarianism?

    Sauvik, lately I find your arguments less logical and more and more imbued with hatred. Instead of personal attacks, if you chose to write well thought out and justified arguments minus all the hatred you could do great justice to spreading the libertarian word.

    I at times feel like recommending some of your posts to my fellow non-libertarian peers, but with so much poison you end up alienating them more than getting them to see your side.

    I love your blog, only if you could reduce some malice it would be great.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Anon: Can you clearly outline what is so wrong with this post? The problem is not with a particular community but with The State and some of the drivers of The State who incidentally happen to be, amongst other, Sardars also.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sauvik - a question...

    Libertarians believe that government should exist for protection of life and property...

    Isn't government regulation for protecting life and property?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hushang:

    The Law exists to protect life and property

    the government exists to uphold the law

    "regulation" is just bureaucratic bullshit

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous, I completely agree with you. Reading the post I definitely got the feeling that all that sardar talk was in poor taste - till i saw the label below which says "Humour". I think Sauvik was trying to be funny - sardar jokes and all that. But, Sauvik, what's happened to your sense of humour?

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's correct....after deliberating on this yesterday...i understood the point...

    ReplyDelete