Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Individualistic Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Our Parliament... And Theirs

It was good to read that Aristotle the Geek “agrees with everything” I have just written against Amartya Sen’s idea of Justice; and also what I have written on Eminent Domain.

That puts the two of us against three major league editors.

Note that this debate is occurring in a “para-parliament.” This is where actual people are speaking – not their representatives. This is where the real action happens. What people think on issues is the focal matter of “politics”; and real “political influence” is nothing more than the ability to influence public opinion on these issues.

It is here that the ideas of Liberty, Property and Justice – as expounded by the great classical liberals of yesteryears, which form the bedrock of modern libertarianism – are gaining ground.

And these twin debates – one on Amartya Sen’s idea of Justice and the other on land acquisition – are a welcome opportunity to spread these ideas.

The reason why these eminent editors have got it wrong is that they are not consistently “liberal” – in the classical sense. They hold views that do not consistently uphold the inviolability of property because they have not thought things through for themselves, in their own minds. I recommend to them Frederic Bastiat’s The Law.

Private property is what the entire ball game is about. We make India a great piece of real estate.

Which is why we stress land records, not ID cards.

[Jug Suraiya warns that compulsory ID cards will lead to police excesses.]

While all this action is happening in our para-parliament, Chacha Manmohan is going to bare all about Pakistan and terrorism in the Lok Sabha – of which I don’t think he is a member.

Recently, the Lok Sabha passed 8 bills in 17 minutes without debate. Parliament met for just 32 days last year. And almost every day the proceedings ended in an uproar.

Read the news here.

Cha Cha is going to talk to this parliament. A political leader must talk to the people.

Anyway, I am fed up about Pakistan and terrorism. I demand Liberty Under Law for all immediately. What matters is how you survive – which is The Free Market. Yeah, there may be some terrorists, Maoists or other violent creeps out there, but we trust in luck, in god, and in our own .45 Magnums to tackle such creeps. If Mumbaikars had been armed, they would have themselves eliminated the entire Kasab gang in a few hours. The State took a few days. And remember, a gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.

So let us forget about Cha Cha and the Lowk Sabha and Pakistan.

Let us think of Liberty.

Spread the news in your own para-parliament.

11 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. hmph....sauviks talks aboout the bore of his chilam...its a .45 magnum...and its legaly illegal...it blows everyones mind.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not everyone can or wants to use a gun. And how on earth can ordinary people fight terrorists - it's absurd to say that Bombayites could have done it if they'd been armed. Don't you think you go overboard sometimes?

    ReplyDelete
  4. there are life-saving skills all have to learn - like driving safe or swimming. the same applies to handling firearms. think of the future, as newer kinds of weapons emerge. should people own them, or should The State?

    about the .45 Magnum (the comment that got deleted by its author) - i think i remember my 'dirty harry'. he distinctly said that his gun was a .45 Magnum.

    Chillums are 12 bore on top and .22 below. they're not based on ballistics, but on Smokeology.

    ha ha

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm the guy who retracted his "There ain't nothing like a .45 Magnum" comment. Turns out that there is -- but it's a very rarely used calibre/weapon.

    Now Dirty Harry definitely used a 44 Magnum. A .44 Magnum revolver loaded with .44 Special cartridges, if you want to get technical.

    Not a big deal -- not trying to prove you wrong or anything, just a little thing that bugged me. Wish it was legal to buy anything above a .32 calibre in India.. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks Devroop: Dirty Harry used a .44 Magnum. I checked. Here is the video clip of the scene:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61z9V7e0beo

    I would buy a double barrel pump action shotgun too. :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. If people were armed, terrorists wouldn't even dare to do the Mumbai kind of attack. Simply because they wouldn't know who is armed and who isn't. A state which disarms its people (for its own convenience) leaves them terribly vulnerable. It's our choice. Do we want to be an aam aadmi or an armed aadmi? :-).

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nice pun, Ramesh. But I don't want to lose an arm and a leg handling an AK47, grenades, etc, which terrorists use. Life is hard enough - I am now required to shoot and kill people as well? What on earth do i pay taxes for? And how much - at the end of the day - is the aam aadmi expected to do?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous: Ramesh is right. It is either "aam aadmi" or "armed aadmi." It is easier to handle greaneds, guns etc. than it is to drive a motorcycle on our city roads. Yet, millions accomplish the latter.

    You are paying taxes foolishly.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Why must I be forced to use a gun/grenade/AK47 when I abhor the idea of killing someone, even if in self defence? And how can you say killing another human being comes as easily as riding a motorcycle? This is worse than drafting people into the army. Even during the world war there were conscientious objectors. Can you imagine the potential danger of millions of people armed to the teeth? It's the craziest thing I've ever heard of.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You can hire bodyguards or other security arrangements quite easily from The Market. My locality in Delhi uses private security guards - and every house contributes to the cost. The arrangement is highly satisfactory.

    No one can force you to carry a gun.

    But I believe in an armed citizenry.

    ReplyDelete