Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Individualistic Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Sunday, March 22, 2009

On The Tata Nano... And A Car For Every Indian

As a committed free trader, that too of the unilateral variety, I find little to cheer about the launch of the Tata Nano, the world’s cheapest car, with its 623 cc engine. To me it sounds too much like “import substitution industrialization” – the term that was used by my Economics professors in college to describe what we now call “cronyism.”

After all, used car imports will deliver cheaper cars with bigger engines to our people. 623 cc means no air-conditioner. It means the impossibility of carrying a family of 4 uphill – even over a flyover. Note that Tata trucks are all underpowered and overloaded. The Nano will be more of the same. I advocate duty-free imports of used cars, trucks and buses.

As Milton Friedman noted on his visit to Bombay in the early 60s, a second-hand Buick was selling there for over 2000 US dollars. And he had himself sold the same model in the USA for just 22 dollars!

To quote Friedman:

“Automobiles provide a striking example of the economic waste produced by this [import substitution] policy. In the name of restricting ‘luxuries’ to ‘save foreign exchange’, the importation of automobiles from abroad is in effect prohibited, whether these are second-hand or new. But at the same time, new automobiles, copies of foreign makes, are being produced at very high cost in small runs under extremely uneconomic conditions at four different plants in India. These are available by one channel or another for the ‘luxury’ consumption it is said to be desirable to suppress. Many of their components are imported, and many of those [components] made in India use indirectly imported materials. The result is that not only is the total cost of the amount of motor transportation actually produced multiplied manifold, but even the foreign exchange cost is probably larger.

The results are most striking in the market for second-hand cars. A car that I sold for $22 before I left the US (a 1950 Buick)was being quoted in Bombay when I was there at Rs 7,500 to Rs 10,000 or $ 1,500 at the official exchange rate and over $ 2,000 at the free market rate. Clearly, the sensible and cheap way for India to get automobile transportation is to import second-hand cars and trucks from abroad. Aside from the direct saving through getting cars cheap, this would have the great indirect advantage of promoting technical literacy, using the abundant manpower resources of India, and conserving capital. But India in effect says, ‘We are too poor to buy second-hand motor vehicles, we must buy new ones’!


Note that the Tata Nano relies on Bosch fuel injection: almost all essential components are imported.

Apart from the nonsensonomics of banning used car imports, we Indians must also note that there is a great deal of nonsenspolitics involved in the Nano. Recall Singur and the misuse of “eminent domain” for the Tatas. And recall that it is Narendra Modi who has finally picked up the Nano project.

An interesting and thoughtful article by Shiv Visvanathan compares Sanjay Gandhi, Narendra Modi and Hitler. All three supported a “people’s car.” And all three used violence as their political means.

I have written a monograph on automobiles for Liberty Institute. It envisions a country where each citizen has a car. It champions duty-free used car imports. It argues that the best automobile policy is no policy – let trade and markets, and the consumer, decide. Let the consumer be the king, not the minister or his crony. The paper, entitled “Four Wheels For All: The Case for the Rapid Automobilization of India” can be accessed here.

Enjoy the read.

7 comments:

  1. Hi Sauvik,

    I'm not all that convinced that the Nano is a case of Import Substitution - at least, that was not it's raison d'etre, in my opinion.

    I have nothing against importing cars at zero duty (and I see no reason to stop only at cars), but that surely is not the same thing as making a case against the Nano.

    If there exists a market for the Nano, and if people wish to purchase such a car (no matter the lack of power and other features), then they should be allowed to do so. For better or for worse, that is their choice.

    Also, congratulations on such a consistent championing of free trade and liberty. I have been reading your blog for a long time, and was able to take exception to your stance only today.

    Cheers,
    Ashish

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ashish: Agreed, if people want to buy 623 cc cars, they are free to do so. But I do believe if used cars imports had been allowed from the 1990s, when our "voodoo liberalization" began, Tata Motors might have folded up long ago. They would never have produced the Indica, and there would be no Nano. But that's a guess.

    In any case, the Nano and the Indica are instances of "import substitution" because the import duty on used cars remains at 180 per cent.

    And as far as the auto MNCs in India are concerned, this high import duty on used cars is good for them - for they are all engaged in "tariff jumping."

    There are so many distortions in the market because of our The State.

    And thanks for your kind words.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hypothetically speaking - agreed. In fact, one can in that case imagine a "best of all worlds" scenario. Think of an India that allowed zero duty used car imports, and Tata's and Maruti (to name only two) focusing exclusively on providing Service and Upkeep facilities. Given our relative advantage in cheap labour and adequate R&D, this would be a very potent combination.
    But still, I'd hesitate to classify the Nano as an Import Substitute, because that's a post-fact conclusion, not a cause of the Nano's creation - if you get what I mean. The cause is the demand that is all-too-visible in the number of advance bookings.

    Still, I guess we could go on about this forever. I get your point, and hopefully, the converse is true as well!

    Cheers,
    Ashish

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am an admirer of your blogs. Yes, I agree. I remember leaving UK and selling my Hyundai 1000cc (Santro), in not-at-all-bad condition for 900 pounds (say Rs 70,000). Had my country not restricted me I would just have been too glad to get it home.

    Even environment too. I wonder if Nano is more environment friendlier than 2nd (or even 5th hand cars) from the west. Car safety is another issue not asked. Are we talking about these as well?

    Sauvik, can you throw light on how all these economic policies are decided at top level?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Talking about cars and politics...

    There is a ranket which thrives on legislating which cars can run as taxis and which not. And the rule changes sometimes from year to year, depending on which car companies bribe the legislators. The poor old taxi wallas, have no choice but to pay monopoly prices. Talk about reverse Robinhood.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This post gives a relief when everybody else is going overboard in praising Nano & Ratan Tata. But I think Sanjay Gandhi's endeavor to manufacture Janata car in India has revolutionised india auto industry. it's better to put plant in the country and generate employment rather than importing. Otherwise for employment also people would be staring at the Government like before liberalization.

    ReplyDelete