Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Individualistic Austro-Libertarian Natural Order Philosophy From Indyeah

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

For A Big Bang Diwali

Diwali, the festival of lights (and sound) is just around the corner, but kids in Delhi are not being allowed to celebrate the occasion with crackers, on the spurious reasoning that this will “damage the environment.”

Oh, how many excuses these killjoys use to kill any fun that life may have in store for us miserable Indians. Our motto must be to suffer real private deprivation for some imaginary “collective good” or the other.

Frankly, I do not think the total amount of smoke released on Diwali night if firecrackers are allowed free rein will exceed that released by a single active volcano in one day. The earth is a huge planet and the atmosphere is even bigger. If Obama can bomb the moon, surely we can blow crackers once a year?

During my years in southern Goa, one thing that never ceased to amaze me was the fact that not a single night would pass without a whole lot of crackers going off. I made some polite inquiries as to what my neighbours were celebrating every night and was told that the occasions vary. In one house, crackers would go off to herald the birth of a child. In another house, to celebrate the start of a new business. In a third, the purchase of a new car. In a fourth… It could be anything. But crackers are a must. Every night. Without fail. I loved it. Chitty chitty bang bang night after night.

Of course, this fascination for crackers was reflected in the nearest market. In Chaudi, my nearest town, there was a shop selling crackers throughout the year. In Delhi you never get crackers except during Diwali. But in Goa, they sell every day. What does Delhi gain by banning crackers even for the one great celebration all Indians enjoy? We must look not only at the loss of fun, but also at the loss of business, and its implications.

Say’s Law tells us that “the sale of X gives rise to the demand for all non-X.” So, if I get to sell my bhel-puri, I am possessed of the means to buy whatever else the market has to offer, except bhel-puri, which I will not demand. I might buy clothes, music, books, tandoori chicken, cold beer – whatever. All these businesses that do not compete with bhel-puri have an interest in seeing that I am allowed to sell bhel-puri. If I am debarred, the energy in the entire catallaxy is reduced.

Applying Say’s Law to the ban on crackers in Delhi, we see that this policy does not hurt just the firecracker business alone; it hurts all other businesses as well. For, who knows, maybe a few SUVs would have been purchased in Sivakasi if Liberty reigned. With liberty, just as the sweetmeat-wallahs get rich on Diwali, so too would the cracker sellers. Then, just as the sweetmeat-wallahs would splurge on other offerings on the market, so too would the cracker-wallahs.

The Lesson: Restrictions and bans hurt not the directly affected industry alone; they hurt the entire market order.

I am therefore of the opinion that we the suffering masses of Delhi should celebrate any and every occasion that comes our way to the hilt, without any holding back. And it is our duty and obligation to our children to ensure that they enjoy whatever small joys life may afford. Diwali is an annual event. And a big one. Let us enjoy it. The killjoys who profess to care for clean air should be put in their place. They are causing all-round losses to the civic community.

11 comments:

  1. though i disagree with the reasons used by the state to clamp down on crackers, absent any market mechanism to determine sound and air pollution caused by these crackers, i dont have much sympathy for these loud noise lovers.
    as a father of an infant and son of old parents,i find it difficult to live in mumbai during diwali becaue of obvious health issues. the only recourse i have is to take a vacation to somewhere people arent fond of heartstopping earsplitting crackers.

    if there were property rights defined to protect my peace, my neighbors would have been forced to pay for my forced vacation

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't think you're right. Perhaps you should check the facts. All the smoke from the crackers does tend to hang around in the air above the city, possibly because there's already so much smog. For those suffering from respiratory diseases it must be really distressing. Personally I don't care for crackers. The boom of the atomic bombs can be deafening. Also, driving in a car becomes impossible because of crackers going off everywhere. I'm very glad there will be no crackers this year.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Guys: Just came across this quote from Ludwig von Mises. In "Human Action" he says:

    "Freedom is indivisible. As soon as one starts restricting it, one sets upon a perilous slope."

    We cannot stop spontaneous public festivities. We should not. We must not. Why Diwali? Think of Holi then.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "We cannot stop spontaneous public festivities. We should not. ".
    Why not?

    However you see it, Diwali celebrations are typically an infringement on each individual's personal space. If all individuals were like you(which I doubt very strongly), it could be excused. But even if a single one of them feels an infringement at a personal level, we have no business forcing it on him. That much respect for individual liberty is enshrined even, in the Indian Constitution.

    If freedom is indeed indivisible, would you allow me to arrange my dance class(only once a year!) in your bedroom?I think I'd really love it, and I guarantee you that I'd be able to get a signed copy of at least 15 people staying around you, volunteering to make the class a decibel fest.

    I am quoting Amit Verma here:

    http://indiauncut.com/iublog/article/vir-sanghvi-exercises-his-free-speech/

    "Imagine, for example, if Raj Thackeray was to come to your house and demand that he make a speech from your living room window. Obviously you’d say, “This is my house, get the hell outta here!” Would you then be censoring Thackeray, and denying him his right to free speech? "

    ReplyDelete
  5. Guys,

    I think the problem may lie in the fact that we don't hesitate to take the most extreme action rather than trying to find an acceptable solution to such simple issues first. Firecrackers pose various hazards- to those with respiratory disorders living in densely populated areas and from a safety standpoint (I got badly burnt by an exploding anaar as a kid so believe me I know). However, the solution is not to ban the whole thing- just like the firecrackerwallahs shouldn’t be allowed to infringe on the peace-and-quiet+clean-air-lovers' rights, the latter shouldn’t be allowed to deprive the former of the simple joy derived from bursting firecrackers. One compromise could be that certain designated parks/public spaces be available for any fireworks with medical staff standing by (the norm in most Western countries).

    Unfortunately, our mindsets support the extremes, resulting in constant usurpation of rights. Sauvik is 100% right- read this by German Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the inactivity of German intellectuals following the Nazi rise to power:
    First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a communist;
    Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist;
    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;
    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew;
    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.

    So we can get fireworks banned, and smoking and drinking and dancing in bars and put a production quota on cars (because they pollute, and force all to ride in buses) and censor films arbitrarily (because anyone can take offense to anything) and so on, but we will be (and already are) paying a really high price for it.

    AKS

    ReplyDelete
  6. @ Krishna: You cannot dance in my bedroom because it is my property and I will not allow you. Raj Thackeray, for the same reason, cannot exercise free speech on my private property.

    On Diwali and Holi, it is public revelry in public spaces. And when the majority participate in the festivities, the rest have to grin and bear it. Of course, torts should apply to all injuries caused by negligence. Then, the rest will look after itself.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Sauvik:
    My point exactly. If I can't dance in your bedroom, it is because it is your private property. A corollary of that position is : I can't play Holi staying in apartment on top of you and not care about gulal falling down and staining your living room carpet.

    So should I own the right to create as much noise as I want to on Diwali, knowing that
    you might not appreciate the disturbance(Obviously,this might not apply - then there isn't even a problem in the first place) After all, instead of gulal, it is the Sivakasi sound that I am impinging on your private property.

    Of course, I agree with you about torts being applied: It is the exact same point I am making. We seem to differ about what constitutes an "injury".

    Also, one crucial point. You may argue that even the air I breathe may make its way into your room - would that be an infringement? Well, I can't control it. Nor can anyone else.

    Otherwise, I don't think it follows that the rest have to "grin and bear it". Think of all the times this argument could have been used in the last century(even earlier) . Hindu women wouldn't have had property rights, Sati might be around, Bollywood would still be making Jeetendra family dramas(yes , the majority of Indians must have liked them till Farhan came along - there were so many of them ).

    I won't be talking about this now. I invite you to have the last word on it. After all, it's your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  8. There can never be a perfect society, perfect order and perfect justice.

    My ideal is a perfect liberty and a tolerable justice.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am not sure exactly what benefits can one derive by burning crackers on diwali.

    I am a marwari, and diwali is the single most important festival for us. Yet I have refrained from burning crackers for last 12 years. The reasons are many, and pollution is just one of them. For one, I dont like to see my, or my dad's hard earned money go up in smoke for a few mins, if not seconds' worth of pleasure.

    I would like to discourage employment of child labor, which takes place en-mass in cracker producing industry. I dislike when my neighbor burns a extremely loud cracker at 2 in night, when me and my family is sound asleep, and are jolted awake by the loud noise.

    I had a paper on carbon markets and environmental protection during my mba, which exposed me to the need to do our bit towards reducing global warming and environmental pollution.

    A single active volcano might be capable of adding more pollution in single day than all crackers combined, but that volcano is not set alight by us. It is a factor beyond our control. Doesnt mean we should stop doing our bit to protect the environment.

    I feel banning crackers was one of the few right decisions that our government has made, and we should extend our support.

    As it is, the central idea of Diwali is to share and spread joy, much like what westerners do during Christmas. There are many other ways of celebration, and of sharing and spreading joy, which are far more effective and pleasant. People are free to celebrate, esp when they get into the true spirit of the occasion. One does not need crackers for that.

    There never can be perfect liberty in any society, as that would lead to complete breakdown of society and life as we know it. "Perfect liberty and tolerable justice" are at best good sounding ideals, which shouldnt be put to practice.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Gagan: In a libertarian society, people like you would be free to build localities, towns and cities wherein you could practice cracker-free Diwalis, just as I would be free to live in southern Goa, where crackers are blown every single night. There is an anthem for towns such as yours. It's called "Nutbush City Limits" by Ike & Tina Turner. I strongly recommend that you hear it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Gagan: YouTube, of course, has the song:

    NUTBUSH CITY LIMITS by Ike & Tina Turner

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipOz_k9zvzo

    ReplyDelete